from Cycle Economist
From The Desk of David Gurwitz:
For new clients, we mentioned on CNBC in late 2014 that we would not
see more than 5% upside in Equities until the big crash starting in 2017
At the time, the S&P Futures was trading around 2120 Although it
reached that level a few times afterwards, we felt being long stocks was
risky, and many stocks lost a big portion of their market
capitalization We sent the study below as #2016 – 013 Charles Nenner
Research Center – Summary of 5 Economic Indicator Forecasts and Some
Thoughts on “Fundamentals” – Jan 24, 2016 Sunday It explains how cycles
work We quote in part from that study: Late in 2014, based on our cycle
work, we noticed instability in the markets For our new subscribers,
we review our philosophy: Cycles predict the ways investors will react
to the news and events – based on rigorous analysis and calculations of
past patterns. We do not know these events, but they do not have to
happen for the effect to occur – at cycle tops or bottoms For example,
if the Fed only thinks about raising rates, it already has an effect At
cycle tops, the media will bring up every negative detail they can come
up with. At cycle bottoms, the opposite is true – the media will bring
up every positive detail they can come up with. When President Reagan
began serving in 1981, it seemed that he could do no wrong – and longer
term equity market cycles were up from that point,. Therefore, we
consider these cyclical and target patterns to be more fundamental than
so-called “fundamentals”., The problem arises when long term investors
decide – based on cycles – to leave the markets and short term investors
take over.
Click Here to Listen to the Audio
No comments:
Post a Comment