by James Stafford,
Oilprice.com
Shale Gas Will be the Next Bubble to Pop – An Interview with Arthur Berman
The “shale revolution” has been grabbing a great deal of headlines
for some time now. A favourite topic of investors, sector commentators
and analysts – many of whom claim we are about to enter a new energy era
with cheap and abundant shale gas leading the charge. But on closer
examination the incredible claims and figures behind many of the plays
just don’t add up. To help us to look past the hype and take a critical
look at whether shale really is the golden goose many believe it to be
or just another over-hyped bubble that is about to pop, we were
fortunate to speak with energy expert Arthur Berman.
Arthur is a geological consultant with thirty-four years of
experience in petroleum exploration and production. He is currently
consulting for several E&P companies and capital groups in the
energy sector. He frequently gives keynote addresses for investment
conferences and is interviewed about energy topics on television, radio,
and national print and web publications including CNBC, CNN, Platt’s
Energy Week, BNN, Bloomberg, Platt’s, Financial Times, and New York
Times. You can find out more about Arthur by visiting his website:
http://petroleumtruthreport.blogspot.com/
In the interview Arthur talks about:
· Why shale gas will be the next bubble to pop
· Why Japan can’t afford to abandon nuclear power
· Why the United States shouldn’t turn its back on Canada’s tar sands
· Why renewables won’t make a meaningful impact for many years
· Why the shale boom will not have a big impact on foreign policy
· Why Romney and Obama know next to nothing about fossil fuel energy
Interview conducted by James Stafford of Oilprice.com
James Stafford: How do you see the shale boom impacting U.S. foreign policy?
Arthur Berman: Well, not very much is my simple answer.
A lot of investors from other parts of the world, particularly the
oil-rich parts have been making somewhat high-risk investments in the
United States for many years and, for a long time, those investments
were in real estate.
Now these people have shifted their focus and are putting cash into
shale. There are two important things going on here, one is that the
capital isn’t going to last forever, especially since shale gas is a
commercial failure. Shale gas has lost hundreds of billions of dollars
and investors will not keep on pumping money into something that doesn’t
generate a return.
The second thing that nobody thinks very much about is the decline
rates shale reservoirs experience. Well, I’ve looked at this. The
decline rates are incredibly high. In the Eagleford shale, which is
supposed to be the mother of all shale oil plays, the annual decline
rate is higher than 42%.
They’re going to have to drill hundreds, almost 1000 wells in the
Eagleford shale, every year, to keep production flat. Just for one play,
we’re talking about $10 or $12 billion a year just to replace supply. I
add all these things up and it starts to approach the amount of money
needed to bail out the banking industry. Where is that money going to
come from? Do you see what I’m saying?
(more)