Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Money Market Funds Might Need Bailout Again
The Wall Street Journal raised the specter of another money market fund crisis that could require bailout of money market funds that have unwisely invested too heavily in the short-term debt of European banks caught up in the contagion of sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere.
The WSJ lead editorial excoriated the mutual fund industry for reaching for yield on money market funds by loading up on European bank securities equal to 50% of their $2.7 trillion assets. Forbes also raised this issue by quoting Jim Grant’s Interest Rate Observer on Saturday as to huge position by Fidelity and BlackRock’s money market funds in European securities that may be worth less than the funds’ purchase price.
US money market funds apparently hold far too risky a position in the short-term debt of the European banks because they are the repository of sizable investor money being held on the sidelines until the economic future becomes clearer. However, some 40% of this paper has a maturity of 7 days or less, so that it would require an inability to refund these very short-term obligation for there to be a crisis.
These French, German, Dutch, British banks face potentially troublesome write-downs from the possible debt default of Greece and its ramifications for Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy. European banks have loans outstanding to these nations of over $1.5 trillion.
In the wake of Lehman’s bankruptcy in September, 2008, a large money market fund holding an unwise batch of Lehman bonds, and suffered from its net asset valuation falling below the sacrosanct $1.00 a share. This event triggered a panic among holders of money market funds– which are supposed to be almost as safe as short term Treasuries.
The Federal Reserve was forced to guarantee the hundreds of billions ordinary citizens held in these funds, which were basic savings that were thought to be entirely secure. When the crisis quieted down, the guarantee was removed. Let’s hope there is no repeat of the 2008 crisis in the money market fund industry.
Google Delivers Cash flow and future stock growth : GOOG
At least one 25,000-person organization, InterContinental Hotels, has taken its employees off Microsoft email and Office applications and moved them on to Google’s Cloud Apps, according to the New York Times. For a typical business, Google charges $50 a user each year to use its email and office applications that are delivered from Google’s computing systems. InterContinental estimates that Google Cloud Apps will save it millions.
And InterContinental is not the only one to stick a knife in the heart of Microsoft’s $20-billion-a-year, 60%-operating-margin, Office business. Others that switched to Google Cloud Apps, according to the Times:
- The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, (25,000 employees)
- State of Wyoming, (10,000); and
- McClatchy Group (8,500).
- Microsoft is fighting back by introducing its Office 365 for $72 a year. While the idea of competing with Microsoft Office has been around for a while, Google appears to be the first to gain significant traction — it has improved its offerings considerably since they were first introduced.
Google’s revenue just from the four clients mentioned above could total $3.4 million (assuming they are paying full price), and almost 100% of Google Cloud App customers renew the service. Most likely, these employees are likely to be drawn into other Google revenue-generators, so the relatively tiny Cloud App revenue could benefit Google in other ways.
Nevertheless, an investor in Google shares at its current price ($494) must consider the rest of its business — and whether Google has the potential to deliver compelling upside surprises beyond Cloud Apps.
Google’s stock had a great run between its 2004 IPO at $80 and its September 2007 peak of $567 — rising at a compound annual growth rate of 92%. But the stock has since bounced around and is now trading 15% below that peak.
Nevertheless, Google’s financial performance has been spectacular – its revenue is up 36.7% a year over the last five years, and its net income of $8.4 billion rose at a five-year average annual rate of 42.2%. Meanwhile, Google’s cash balance beginning in 2006 grew at an annual rate of 33% to $35 billion at the end of 2010, while holding barely any debt.
Google’s most recent quarterly performance was worse than expected due to its massive hiring campaign. In the first quarter of 2011, Google’s net income of $2.3 billion was up 18% from the year before, but its adjusted earnings of $8.08 share was 3 cents below analysts surveyed by FactSet.
While Google revenue rose 27% to about $8.6 billion, which was 37% better than analysts expected, Google’s expenses grew faster than revenue — with Google adding 1,916 employees to end March 2011 with more than 26,300 workers.
Is Google investing too much in its human capital to generate a positive return to its capital providers? No way – it’s earning huge returns on capital. After all, it’s producing positive EVA Momentum, which measures the change in “economic value added” (essentially, profit after deducting capital costs) divided by sales.
In 2010, Google’s EVA momentum was 3%, based on 2009 revenue of $23.7 billion, and EVA that grew from $3.1 billion in 2009 to $3.9 billion in 2010.
And Google’s stock valuation is reasonable — trading at a price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio of 0.94 (where 1.0 is considered fairly valued). Google’s P/E is 18.7 on earnings expected to climb20% to $35.43 a share in 2012.
While I don’t expect Google Cloud Apps to make a big difference in overall revenue, Google stock is likely to pop if all those new employees can invent services that actually generate new sources of revenue growth.
At its current price, there could be more risk by not investing and missing Google’s upside over the longer term.
Jay Taylor: Turning Hard Times Into Good Times
Case-Shiller Home Price Indices
Case Shiller Home Price Indices showed a monthly increase in prices for the first time in eight months. This was for the month of April, which is usually the beginning of the best six months of the year for home sales. (See this chart of Non Seasonally adjusted Existing Home Sales)
Davied Blitzer of S&P Indices noted “However, the seasonally adjusted numbers show that much of the improvement reflects the beginning of the Spring-Summer home buying season. It is much too early to tell if this is a turning point or simply due to some warmer weather”
~~~
Wayne Madsen : Goldman Sachs Stole 1.3 Billion from Libyan Sovereign Wealth Fund
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release Has Now Been Fully Priced In As Crude, Gasoline Surge
Remember how 4 very long days ago, the 60 million barrel SPR release was vaunted as being the reason for the second consumer renaissance after it was largely expected it would lead to sub $90 crude, and low $3/gallon gas, and result in every Joe Sixpack going out and buying 3 houses at least? Well, so much for that: the IEA's action has now been fully priced in and WTI is back to precisely where it was before the IEA announcement on Thursday. Which means that what some said was a shadow QE (and don't get us started on all the mainstream media "journalists", among which Bloomberg and CNN, who continue to confuse QE Lite with something they call QE 2.5) had a half life of just over 3 days. Expect future intervention half lives to continue declining, as the criminal banking cartel's ammunition is now down to just one thing, the only thing, printing.
Oh, and for those morons predicting a second half economic pick up, here's intraday gasoline. Have fun explaining that to whoever it is that pays your bonus check.
GREECE, IRELAND AND PORTUGAL DEFAULT PROBABILITIES ABOVE 50%
I see headlines like, “Euro Maintains Gain on Greek Debt Optimism” and I am just not sure what everyone else is looking at. As far as the credit default swap market is concerned, Greece has already defaulted, it is just a matter of when and in what form. Ireland and Portugal are basically at levels that share a similar fate. Next question is whether Italy and Spain fall into the hole.
Jim Rogers: Oil, Coffee, Gold to Soar Higher
Downturns are normal, Rogers tells IndexUniverse.com.
Take oil.
"If you look at oil, for instance, it has gone down over 50 percent three or four different times since 1998," says Rogers, famous for his bullish stance on commodities.
"That's what markets do, and they will continue to do that."
Jim Rogers (Getty Images photo) |
"We know that there are huge shortages of agriculture developing," Rogers says.
"I don’t know if you knew this, but the average age of farmers in America is 58 years old. In 10 years, they’re going to be 68, if they’re still alive. Throughout the world, we have serious, maybe even catastrophic developments in agriculture, which is going to hurt us all over the next couple of decades."
Oil supplies will remain tight as well.
Many commodities have rallied over the past few years, and although some have cooled a bit, expect the buying to continue, experts say.
"The long-term perspective is that many commodities have supply constraints," says Walter "Bucky" Hellwig, who helps manage $17 billion of assets at BB&T Wealth Management in Birmingham, Alabama, according to Bloomberg.
Look for gains in gold, which tends to do well amid times of rising inflation rates.
"That’s an environment where you want commodities in your portfolio."
China Risks Property-Bubble Burst
Chinese real estate prices are declining, which has investors asking whether the country’s economy is over-leveraged. Could China’s real-estate bubble burst in coming years-and, if it does, how might that affect other countries? WSJ’s Bob Davis reports.