Friday, November 11, 2011

France, the New Elephant in the Room

On January 7, long before Italy was in the spotlight of mainstream media attention, I wrote Italy The Invisible Elephant.

It was five or six months before Italy became an uncloaked popular economic topic.

However, "elephant hunting" is now a popular sport and mainstream media has done a better job at spotting the next one (with help of S&P threats to France's AAA rating of course).

Elephant Spotting Articles

San Francisco Chronicle: France Plans EU7 Billion in Taxes, Cuts to Save AAA Rating
France unveiled tax increases and spending cuts amounting to 7 billion euros ($9.6 billion) for next year to defend its triple-A rating as growth slows and Europe's debt crisis deepens.

The country will increase some levies on large companies, push up the lower end of its range of value-added taxes and curb welfare spending, Prime Minister Francois Fillon said today.

"French people must roll up their sleeves," Fillon said at a press conference in Paris. "We have one goal: to protect the French people from the severe difficulties faced by some European countries."
Los Angeles Times: Eurozone debt jitters creeping into French bonds
The European debt crisis has gone from bad to worse as Italian government bond yields have soared, threatening the solvency of the Eurozone’s third-largest economy.

But things could go from worse to worst if bond yields keep rising in France, the continent’s No. 2 economy after Germany.

The French government knows it can’t afford for the bond market to turn on it. Paris announced a new round of spending cuts last week aimed at ensuring that the country holds on to its coveted AAA credit rating.

Moody’s Investors Service warned last month that it might put a negative outlook on France’s top-rung rating if Paris made too many commitments to back up its banks or other Eurozone states with tax dollars.

But France’s need to protect itself also raises doubts about its ability to extend help to Italy as Rome’s debt nightmare worsens.
Ah yes, how can you save Greece and Italy if your concern is to save yourself?

The answer is you cannot and a quick look at sovereign debt spreads will show the bond market is starting to figure that out.

Sovereign Debt Table France vs. Germany

DurationGermanyFranceSpread
2-Year0.381.611.23
3-Year0.511.811.30
5-Year0.942.461.52
10-Year1.783.471.69


To help put that spread table into perspective let's look at today's action in 10-Year and 2-Year government bonds.

France 2-Year Government Bonds



France 10-Year Government Bonds




Germany 2-Year Government Bonds



Germany 10-Year Government Bonds



The two-day move in French bond yields vs. German is likely a 6-sigma event. Today alone, the 2-year yield rose 27 basis points vs. 2 for Germany.

Unfortunately the chart does not reflect this because Bloomberg charts are hopelessly a day out of sync with the numbers posted left of the chart.

While the equity markets are cheering the Rise of the Borg (and also the ECB stepping into the fray as the buyer of last resort of Italian bonds), a new elephant, completely visible, stepped into the room.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Jean Marie Eveillard: If Italy Sells its Gold Here is What Will Happen

from King World News:

With gold near $1,750, silver around $34 and investors around the world focused on Europe’s debt problems, today King World News interviewed legendary value investor Jean Marie Eveillard, who oversees $50 billion at First Eagle Funds. KWN wanted to get Eveillard’s thoughts on what is happening in Europe and how it will impact the price of gold. When asked about Europe, Eveillard replied, “I understand the stock market was up today in Europe and the US, to some extent, because there is a new Greek Prime Minister. It doesn’t matter, Greece is gone. Italy is too big to fail but it’s also too big to bail. I think it’s a phenomenon of contagion.”

Jean Marie Eveillard continues: Read More @ KingWorldNews.com




Thursday, November 10, 2011

Marc Faber: They Can Postpone the Endgame for Five or Ten Years

Economist, global trend analyst and well know Doctor of Doom, Marc Faber, suggests that with so many monetary, fiscal and political variables at play, the end game of this crisis can be delayed for months or years to come. Faber, who has warned since before the 2008 crisis that entire nations would fail due to high debt levels, that hyperinflation is an inevitable outcome of the Fed’s accounting games, and that war will be the ultimate result, shares his views on CNBC:

[Video Interview Below]

I don’t know what other people think, but what I think will happen eventually – and there are so many contradictory statements coming out that nobody really knows – but eventually the same will happen as in the United States. The ECB (European Central Bank) will print money one way or the other. And, the debts that essentially should be written down to realistic value will continue to be carried on the books of banks at unrealistic values. So, the end crisis will be postponed until the sovereigns go bankrupt.

…

Before they go bankrupt they’ll print money. They’ll print endless money. As long as we have Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellin at the Fed they’ll print money and so they can postpone the end game endlessly…Endlessly not, but say for another five to ten years.

Each money printing exercise brings about unintended consequences. These unintended consequences are partly higher inflation rates than had no money been printed.

When the banking system came unhinged in 2008 many assumed the system would simply collapse into a depression right then and there, reset, and then eventually restart the economic growth cycle. Instead, the US government and central bank decided to intervene. While this “saved” the system at the time, recapitalized banks, boosted stock markets, and pumped what some believe to be in excess of $20 Trillion into the global economy, it really did nothing but further prolong the inevitable. Furthermore, it made the eventual and unavoidable collapse of debt and leverage that much worse.

Now, with Europe very much on the brink, the ECB is really left with no other choice than to print trillions of Euros. The consequences of the money printing in the U.S. and Europe, according to Faber (and many others), will not be pretty:

I think I am very constructive and a I’m a great optimist in life, otherwise I would commit suicide in view of the kind of governments we have nowadays.

Because, for sure, they will take wealth away from well-to-do people one way or the other. And from the middle class they will take it away through inflating the economy and lowering the standards of living.

…So I think that we are in a very difficult situation…

…

If you print money the U.S. it doesn’t mean that it creates bubbles in the U.S. It can create bubbles in your neighboring regions – say Latin America, or Asia, or it can create bubbles in precious metals or in commodities, or in home prices somewhere else in the world. Or, say, for instance, in China. And if the Chinese bubble bursts one day, which inevitably will happen, maybe not tomorrow, but maybe in three months or maybe in three years. But when it happens it will have devastating consequences for the global economy.

As Dr. Faber points out, the system is complex and the butterfly effect, while clearly evident, is simply impossible to predict with any meaningful accuracy. For all we know the entire system can collapse in the next 30 days, or, the full fallout may not be witnessed for several years.

All we can do is draw on historical example and the facts as they become available to us.

What we know is that entire nations, including the United States, have bit off more debt than they can chew. There exists no way to pay this debt back. The only option is immediate default or monetary machinations. No politician is willing to pull the trigger on default, and the banks (who are controlling the strings of the political puppets) will not let it happen if they have any sayso in the matter. Thus, we are left with more printing.

As they print more and force prices to rise, they will also cut services that have become essential to millions. They’ll also move to increase taxes and fees across all Western nations. Total collapse of the system may be avoided for now, but the lives of tens of millions of people will be made more difficult with each new dollar they print and every new policy measure they implement. During the great depression there was a decade of strife before the world went to war. In Zimbabwe, the hyperinflation built up for many years before it went super nova – all the while the people suffered.

The eventual outcome of all this, as Doctor Faber has argued, is the end of the world as we have come to know it. This coming paradigm shift is unavoidable.

So what should you do? According to Faber, All Currencies are Doomed, Except for Gold so become your own central bank and trade your fiat paper for hard assets.

In November of 2009 Faber predicted that the coming meltdown in sovereign debt will eventually lead to the worst possible outcome for the people of the world:

The crisis has not solved anything. On the contrary there is less transparency today than there was before. The government’s balance sheet is expanding, and the abuses that have led to the one cause of the crisis have continued.

I think eventually there will be a big bust and then the whole credit expansion will come to an end.

Before that happens, governments will continue printing money which in time will lead to a very high inflation rate, and the economy will not respond to stimulus.

The average family will be hurt by that, and then in order to distract the attention of the people, the governments will go to war.

People ask me against whom? Well, they will invent an enemy.

Chances are, we can’t stop the war that’s coming, just like we can’t stop the debt collapse. The system is just too big, too complex and out of our control. Thus, according to Faber, it’s time to focus on yourself and your family – with investments that will matter when it all falls apart:

With tongue apparently in cheek, he says buy a farm you can tend to yourself way out in the boondocks. And protect it with high voltage fences, barbed wire, booby traps, military weapons and Dobermans.

Forget time lines here and understand that the sheer size and volatility of the system makes it nearly impossible to identify exactly what, when and how. The only thing we need to know is that we are living in the middle of it all right now, and day-by-day, month-by-month, year-by-year it continues to deteriorate.

We’d be ecstatic If Dr. Faber is correct in his assessment that they could potentially postpone the worst-case endgame for five to ten years. That just means we’ve got much more time than we thought to get out of harm’s way.

Reprinted from SHTF Plan.




100% Chance of Crisis, Worse Than 2008: Jim Rogers

The world is definitely going to face another financial crisis stemming from problems in Europe, Jim Rogers said Wednesday.

"We're certainly going to have more crises coming out of Europe and America; the world is in trouble. The world has been spending staggering amounts of money that it doesn't have for a few decades now, and it's all coming home to roost," Rogers, CEO and chairman Rogers Holdings told CNBC.

He added that the crisis would be much worse than the one markets saw in 2008 because the debt is much higher now.

"Last time, America quadrupled its debt. The system is much more extended now, and America cannot quadruple its debt again. Greece cannot double its debt again. The next time around is going to be much worse," Rogers said.

"In 2002 it was bad, in 2008 it was worse and 2012 or 2013 is going to be worse still – be careful," he added.

Rogers said he was long the euro despite the euro zone facing deep crises, but said all paper money was now under duress.

"I own several paper currencies. My theory is that if things get better I will make money in commodities, and if they don't get better I'll make money in commodities because they'll print more money and stocks will be going down a lot," he said.

"I own the euro because everyone is beating it down so badly and the US dollar too," he added.

He said all the main currencies were in terrible shape but he still expected to make money from them.

Rogers told CNBC the only solution to the crisis was to let everyone go bankrupt.

"Get everyone in a room and decide you will go bankrupt. You will survive and we're going to ringfence you. We'll make sure your checks clear. Everyone's deposits are going to be ok, the system's going to survive.

"But we are going to have a lot of pain that way the system would survive because some countries including Germany have credibility," Rogers said.

He said if Greece left the euro it would be a disaster for the Greeks because they would go back to the "same old ways".

"They would start printing money. No one would lend them money. Inflation would go through the roof and the Greek economy would get worse and worse. That's not good for Greece. It's not good for the world," he said.

"It would be better off if we can hold the euro together and we reorganize. People are bankrupt and when people are bankrupt you might as well face reality. Reorganize the assets, competent people (will) come in and you start over from a sound base," Rogers said.


McAlvany Weekly Commentary

A Street View of the Current Gold Market: An Interview With Trader Roy

A Look At This Week’s Show:
-Gold should see $1850 in the next 60 days and should be very bullish in 2012 as well.
-Two macroeconomic events that will drive gold over the next year are loose monetary policy and the potential collapse of an EU member nation.
-Gold should maintain steady double digit growth through at least 2015. Growth could be much more abrupt should something unexpected occur such as an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities or a surprise in the U.S. Presidential election.

Gold Insider Conversations: Roy’s experience as an institutional gold trader over a 32 year period brings insight into the present day gyrations in the precious metals markets. We discuss past present and future events as they relate to Gold, and the various issues which are immediately impacting the price of the metals. He can discuss his views freely as a long time friend, but in confidence. We have left his name and the remainder of his bio out so he can share his thoughts with candor.

Financial Times Deutschland joins hunt for Germany's gold

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

The long clamor about the German gold reserves by GATA and particularly by our friends, the German journalist Lars Schall and the German market analyst Dimitri Speck, this week caught the attention of the German edition of the Financial Times, which published a story headlined "Speculation and Rumors: The Hunt for the Treasure of the Bundesbank."

The Financial Times Deutschland confirms, as GATA has reported, that most of the German gold is stored outside the country, partly for international security reasons but more so now for ease of trading and general subservience to the United States. The FTD story is notable mainly for extracting from the German central bank, the Bundesbank, a statement that no German gold is being leased at the moment.

Unfortunately the FTD's question, or at least the Bundesbank's answer, did not encompass gold swaps, particularly gold swaps with agencies of the U.S. government, also major mechanisms of gold price suppression, which were the focus of Schall's telling recent inquiries of the Bundesbank, inquiries the Bundesbank turned away without answering:

http://www.gata.org/node/9363

And the FTD's story errs completely in asserting: "In the 1960s former Bundesbank president Karl Blessing allegedly sent a letter to the American high commissioner in Germany in which he guaranteed that gold would not be converted into dollars. The letter is unpublished to this day; that's why it cannot be excluded that the commitments went even further."

... Dispatch continues below ...



ADVERTISEMENT

The United States Once Again Can Establish
a Stable Dollar Worth Its Weight in Gold

Lewis E. Lehrman, chairman of the Lehrman Institute, sponsor of The Gold Standard Now project, has released a plan to restore economic growth through a stable dollar.

The plan, titled "The True Gold Standard: A Monetary Reform Plan Without Official Reserve Currencies," responds to the recurrent economic crises of the last century and outlines a detailed proposal for America's leadership on "how we get from here to there." That is, how we get from the present unstable paper dollar to a stable dollar as good as gold.

James Grant, author and editor of Grant's Interest Rate Observer, says of the Lehrman plan: "If you have ever wondered how the world can get from here to there -- from the chaos of depreciating paper to a convertible currency worthy of our children and our grandchildren -- wonder no more. The answer, brilliantly expounded, is between these covers. America has long needed a modern Alexander Hamilton. In Lewis E. Lehrman the country has finally found him."

To learn more and to sign up for The Gold Standard Now's free, noncommercial, weekly report, "Prosperity through Gold," please visit:

http://www.thegoldstandardnow.org/gata



In fact the supposedly mysterious Blessing letter was sent, in 1967, not to the American high commissioner in Germany but to the chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, William McChesney Martin Jr.; it did not guarantee that Germany would not trade gold for dollars but quite the opposite, that Germany would not trade dollars for gold; and GATA published it in January this year, thanks to the efforts of Speck and University of Texas economics professor James K. Galbraith, who obtained a copy of the letter from the Lyndon B. Johnson presidential library at the university:

http://www.gata.org/node/9547

But the FTD story is a good start by a major news organization in getting interested in the details of gold price suppression. The FTD and other news organizations would perform even better service by pressing the Bundesbank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve about gold swaps, the Fed in 2009 having admitted undertaking them --

http://www.gata.org/node/8192

-- and the Bank of England having refused last month to distinguish its gold loans and swaps from its general reporting of its claimed gold reserves:

http://www.gata.org/node/10635

The Financial Times Deutschland story is appended -- first an English translation provided by Schall and then the original in German.

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Speculation and Rumors:

The Hunt for the Treasure of the Bundesbank

Germany is in possession of 3,400 tons of gold, the second-largest gold reserves in the world. But where is the billion-dollar treasure stored? There has been wild speculation about this for years. Financial Times Deutschland went in search of clues.

By Peter Vollmer
Financial Times Deutschland
Monday, November 7, 2011

http://www.ftd.de/finanzen/maerkte/rohstoffe/:spekulation-und-geruechte-...

Anyone who wants to lay his hands on the gold reserves of the Bundesbank -- which are currently approximately 3,401 tons with a current market value of $196 billion -- faces a problem: Where is the gold of the Bundesbank anyway?

This simple question has been the subject of wild speculation. Critical minds claim that the precious metal was largely in the United States, where it was deposited on the one hand during the Cold War as far away as possile from the "Iron Curtain," and on the other hand also as an ideological pledge of loyalty to the alliance of Germany to the United States.

Supercritical spirits even doubt that the Bundesbank has the gold at all.

Let's take one thing at a time.

The big gold reserves of the Federal Republic -- according to recent data from the the mining lobby World Gold Council the second largest in the world after the U.S., which holds with 8,133 tons, more than twice as much -- date from the 1950s. With the economic miracle, West German exports boomed and many nations paid in gold.

In 1968, Germany held 4,000 tons -- the culmination of the German gold holdings. A large portion of these reserves was, however, never transported, which is both logistically and actuarially difficult. The gold simply changed hands at the great trading centers in New York, London, or Paris without ever changing the local storage locations there.

During the Cold War, it seemed too uncertain to deposit the gold at the headquarters of the Bundesbank in the financial metropolis Frankfurt -- just 100 kilometers away from what in the Cold War was called the "Fulda Gap" -- a spot at the inner German border, which would have been ideal for an invasion by Warsaw Pact troops in wartime because of its topography.

Over the years Germany's gold reserves decreased slightly, especially since the gold price dropped between 1980 and 2000, interrupted only by occasional convulsions. With the gold price increasing beginning in 2001 from below $300 per troy ounce to $700 in 2006 and finally above $1,000 in 2008, the perception of gold in the public mind changed, and more and more critical minds were interested in the whereabouts of the gold.

But the Bundesbank was tight-lipped: Its former chief executive, Hans-Helmut Kotz, told the magazine Stern in 2004: "The biggest part of our gold reserves is held at the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Banque de France, in that order." Never again has any representative of the Bundesbank expressed himself in such detail.

Via a written request to the Federal Government, Member of Parliament Peter Gauweiler received in November 2010 no further details of the storage locations but learned that the Bundesbank maintains its gold holdings in physical form -- not in the form of dodgy, windy delivery promises of banks that may be cash-strapped in time of crisis -- and that lending would be made in the current low-percentage range.

... Gold Lender Bundesbank

So anyone who does the treasure hunt has to patch up a map first: for example, from rumors -- 2.300 of the 3.400 tons are allegedly in the vaults of the Federal Reserve Bank in Manhattan. That would be more than two-thirds of the total gold reserves. The testimony of former Bundesbanker Kotz would not be contradicted by that. And because the Bundesbank is so tight-lipped, a lot of yarn is spun.

This also implies that the central bank would have lent the gold to collect interest on the loan -- and to give unspecified market forces such as banks the opportunity to suppress the gold price by selling the borrowed gold at the market. That would be a classic short sale, for which specualators are blamed in the stock and bond markets, and there would have been a lot of winners except for gold owners and producers. The central bank would receive interest for lending the gold that would otherwise uselessly lounge around.

Speculators could suppress the price with the sale of the borrowed gold and buy the gold back later more cheaply and pocket the difference as profit, more so as one pushes the gold price down. And both banks and central banks have an indirect interest in a low gold price, even if their gold reserves are worth less. The price of gold is ultimately a crisis indicator of system stability and future inflation rates; the higher the gold price, the higher the stress in the system, which neither banks nor central banks want.

But either the Bundesbank is lying or the conspiracy theory of "gold price suppression" via short selling with borrowed gold is wrong, because at the request of the Financial Times Germany, the Bundesbank announced that "at present no gold is lent."

Thorsten Schulte has neither a wooden leg nor an eye patch -- only his nickname fits the image of the treasure hunt. The "Silver Boy" is an expert in precious metals. He says: "Of course it is suspect that the Bundesbank reveals so little." There are several explanations. One is that the Bundesbank appeals to reasons of security and business policy.

... 'Diplomatic consideration for the U.S.'

In various Internet forums it is conjectured that the reserve was a dead pledge to the United States. But at the Bundesbank they do not want to hear of that: "We are guided by safety, cost efficiency, and liquidity," said a spokeswoman. Changes of storage locations were not excluded in general, but a transport to Germany's own vaults would be associated with high costs. Therefore, much of the gold is stored abroad.

Most experts consider it likely that Germany does not want to offend the wooden leg of the U.S.: "I suppose it's also about diplomatic consideration for the U.S.," says Schulte.

In the 1960s former Bundesbank president Karl Blessing allegedly sent a letter to the American High Commissioner in Germany in which he guaranteed that gold would not be converted into dollars. The letter is unpublished to this day; that's why it cannot be excluded that the commitments went even further. And even if not: "To carry the gold away from the U.S. would be a distrust signal first-class," says Schulte.

The situation is not as dramatic anyway. Parts of the German gold are simply in New York, Paris, or London because it can be traded or sold better this way. About 60 central banks store their bullion in Manhattan, thus saving the cost of transport. "In addition, there are reputable sources who say that the Bundesbank would bring small quantities to Germany time after time," says "Silver Boy" Schulte.

Therefore, the gold reserves that lie under the Bundesbank branches in Mainz and Frankfurt had not for long been at more than 4 percent of the total, as gold fans speculated over and over again. The Bundesbank told the FTD that "a large part of its gold reserves" are in Germany. However, more precise statements will not be given for the time being, and therefore conspiracy theorists will continue in dark nights at the fireplace spinning yarns about the German gold.

Ten Million Homes (19%) Face Foreclosure; 50% of Mortgages Underwater

Fifty to Seventy-Five Percent. That’s how much home prices will slide before this is all over.

Here’s the latest evidence that what we’re looking at is not just some short-term real estate cycle:

Of the 55-million families with mortgages, 10.4-million of them “are sliding toward failure and foreclosure”—a tragedy that will depress the U.S. housing market for years to come, a result of too many houses for sale and too few buyers.

That’s the blunt conclusion of distinguished economics journalist William Greider, to be published in an article in the November 14th issue of The Nation magazine.

America’s “Economic recovery will have to wait until that surplus (excess houses) is gone, because the housing sector has always led the way out of recession,” Greider says. “The more housing supply exceeds demand, the more prices fall. The more prices fall, the more families get sucked into the deep muddy. The vicious cycle is known in the industry as the death spiral. So far, there’s no end in sight.”

Source: Global Research via Before It’s News

The fact is, easy money from the Fed and no-income financing by banks took home prices to obscene levels during the real estate boom. The home values we saw at the peak in 2006-early 2007 were totally manufactured and without merit. That’s why over half of American households are now underwater in their mortgages:

According to a note by real estate expert Mark Hanson, referenced by CNBC’s Diana Olick, the truth of the matter is that, if one were to truly factor all implicit equity reductions, the number of underwater houses is…half. Expect this to proceed like a shockwave in the PrimeX space once the market comprehends what this means…

Source: Zero Hedge

The banks will never recover this money.

Nearly 20% of homeowners will, at some point during this crisis, fall into the delinquency/foreclosure process. That is a massive number. Out of 100 homes that may be in your neighborhood, on average, 20 of the homeowners will not be able to make their monthly mortgage payments. Of those 100 homes, fifty of them are underwater in their mortgage.

The numbers will likely get even worse, especially when you consider that interest rates will explode as US dollar risk becomes reality to investors around the world. Imagine what would happen if mortgage rates reached 1981 levels and were in excess of 10% (as high as 18% in some cases!). You think we have a glut of homes on the market now? At 10% interest or more, sales will almost completely lock up.

You can say good bye to the housing recovery for at least a decade. It’s just not going to happen.