Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Where gold's parabolic rise could stop

A few weeks ago the "Power of the Pattern" was suggesting the next key upside price target for Gold was $1,900, per the chart below. (see post here)

At the time of the post, Gold was priced at $1,641. Did $1,900 seem unrealistic less than 3 weesk ago??? Gold has added over $200 per oz since the chart below.

CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE

Well as many in the States wake up this morning...We "are pretty much there"... as Gold hit $1,878 in early market hours.

CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE

As can been seen in the above chart, during the last 9 years, each time Gold has hit channel resistance, it has backed off for a while, until it found support at the bottom of its rising channel. The largest percentage decline during the last 9 years took place at (2), during the 2008 financial crisis, when the "Great Escape" took place. (see Great Escape here)

I shared back in May that one of the largest risks to investors was the "Great Escape" taking place again! What did the "Great Escape" look like in the past?

Investors just wanted out of everything..... U.S stocks, Global stocks, Grains, Live stock, Silver and even Gold. I'm sure glad nothing like that will ever happen again! ;)

I have received numerous emails asking a great question.... where does the next key resistance for Gold come into play if the 261% Fibonacci level/ channel resistance doesn't hold? If Gold breaks above channel and Fibonacci resistance the next Fibonacci Expansion/Extension level comes in around $1,000 higher. Could Gold reach this target? Sure!!!

Suspect two things.....A break of the $1,900 level would see Gold add another 20% to its price in no time and the world might have a couple of new challenges on its hands!

Latest Video Market Update from Marketclub

Watch live streaming video from marketclub at livestream.com

More Insights Into Mass Psychology And Canada's Real Estate Obsession

More insights into mass psychology and Canada's real estate obsession:

Perhaps the most defining features of an asset bubble is a marked and persistent deviation from the underlying metrics that once determined fundamental value. We know how real estate in Canada stacks up when compared to GDP, personal disposable income (cities and provinces), rents (cities and provinces), and inflation. It's not pretty. As with any real estate bubble, the overvaluation is most extreme in a handful of cities. The regional data can be seen in the highlighted links. Certainly not all areas of the country have experienced a massive divergence from underlying fundamentals, but it is extensive enough to concern us.

And with the reliance of the Canadian economy on construction and consumer spending to support employment and GDP growth, a housing correction from current levels would almost certainly be associated with a nasty recession complete with anemic economic growth and persistently high unemployment for several years, a topic I addressed yesterday when we looked at some lessons from Texas, and previously when we looked at how housing supports Canadian GDP.

A second key component to the development of any asset bubble is a new and widespread belief about the 'investment worthiness' of a particular asset. It's one of the key ingredients we discussed in an earlier post about the necessary components of an asset bubble. This shift in perception often occurs slowly at first, then builds under its own momentum as increasing participation in the bubble also serves to drive prices higher in a self-fulfilling loop. Yet this change in perception is often very difficult to measure. It's reported that Robert Shiller became convinced of a US real estate bubble after conducting years of surveys examining people perception of housing and watching respondents' perception of real estate become wildly bullish in the years leading up to the crash. I've explained why overwhelming majorities are contrarian indicators in a previous article.

Unfortunately, such data does not exist in pure form here in Canada. We can gather some insight from reports from CAAMP and RBC, both of which publish survey results, but the necessary historical data is not there from which to compare.

I don't think I need to argue too hard to convince most people that there is wide-spread bullish sentiment towards real estate and an equally pervasive view of real estate as inherently 'safe' and the easiest path to prosperity. However, the goal here is to quantify data in a way that avoids these anecdotes.

The best we can do is to explore data that should have a relatively stable long-term trend, and see if it instead shows a marked deviation from that trend around the same time that the bubble begins, which I would put some time around 2003 when prices began to experience a marked deviation from underlying fundamentals.

Today, Stats Canada released data showing investment in new housing construction, which, as Stats Canada indicates, shows "investment in new housing construction represent(ing) the spending value for individuals, enterprises and governments in the construction of new residential dwellings." This does not include construction investment for cottages, mobile homes, conversions, and renovations. If we compare this to a stable metric like GDP, we might expect that during boom times, demand for new housing would increase as participation in any bubble would have to be widespread. So what does it show?

investment in residential real estate canada

Unfortunately, the data only extends back to 1994. Nevertheless, the trend is clear. The implications seem to be that either there are more people per capita building new homes, which seems a fairly sure guess given our rising home ownership rates across all demographics (see below), OR the values of the homes being built is increasing relative to GDP. Neither of these are sustainable, particularly rising values relative to GDP as it implies an erosion in underlying incomes necessary to support house prices and very likely is associated with rising house size and the emergence of housing as a predominant form of conspicuous consumption, a trend I argued would likely reverse course as it has in the US.

We can add this data to several other data sets that also suggest that shifting consumer perceptions and widespread participation seem to be a hallmark of the current real estate market: (more)

5 Signs Of A Credit Crisis

A credit crisis occurs as a result of an unexpected reduction in accessibility to loans or credit and a sharp increase in the price of obtaining these loans. The credit markets are good indicators of the depth of a credit crisis. They can also provide clues as to when that crisis will ease up. To understand how to judge the severity of the crisis, we must be able to look at a number of factors, such as what is happening with U.S. Treasuries, how it is affecting the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), what effect this has on the TED spread and what all this means for commercial paper and high-yield bonds. In this article, we'll examine how these indicators can be used to determine the severity and overall depth of a credit crisis.

Measuring the Severity of a Credit Crisis
There are several tools that can be used to measure the overall depth of a credit crisis:

U.S Treasuries: U.S. Treasuries are debt obligations issued and backed by the U.S. government. As a credit crisis unfolds, investors take their money out of other assets, such as stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit (CDs) and money markets. This money goes into U.S. Treasuries, which are considered to be one of the safest investments. As the money continues to flow into this area, it forces the yield on short-term treasuries (also known as Treasury bills) down. This lower yield is a sign of high anxiety in the markets as a whole as investors search for safer places to put their money.

LIBOR: LIBOR is the rate that banks charge other banks for short-term loans. These loans can be for one month, three months, six months and one year. When LIBOR rates are high, this is a sign that banks don't trust each other and will result in higher loan rates across the board. This means tighter lending standards and a general unwillingness among banks to take on risk.

TED Spread: This spread represents the change between the three-month LIBOR rate and the three-month rate for U.S. Treasury bills. It is used to measure the amount of pressure on the credit markets. Generally, the spread has stayed under 50 basis points. The bigger the difference between the two, the more worry there is about the credit markets. Economists will look at this to determine how risk-averse banks and investors really are.

Commercial Paper: Commercial papers are unsecured debts used by banks or companies to finance their short-term needs. These needs can range from accounts receivable (AR) to payroll to inventory. Generally, maturities for commercial paper range from overnight to nine months. Higher interest rates make it more difficult for businesses to obtain the money they need to fund their day-to-day operations so that they can continue to expand. These high rates can cause businesses to pay the higher costs or not borrow at all. This creates a situation in which companies look for ways to get the money they need to fund their short-term operations; when more commercial paper is issued, this can be a sign of a tight credit market.

High-Yield Bonds:
High-yield bonds are bonds that do not qualify for investment-grade status. Ratings agencies rate high-yield bonds as those with the greatest chance of default. The higher the yields on these types of bonds, the tighter the credit market is likely to be as this suggests that there are few borrowing opportunities for businesses. Businesses that are unable to get more favorable financing may issue bonds instead.

Using Indicators to Understand a Credit Crisis

Any indicator by itself, while important, will not provide the overall big picture. However, when a combination of indicators consistently points in the same direction, this correlation can point to which direction the credit markets are headed. If the credit markets are headed toward crisis, these indicators can provide insight into how big the credit crisis will be and how afraid banks or investors are to take risk. If the fear is great enough, it can spill over into the general economy, causing recession. Conversely, when indicators are weakening, this suggests that banks and investors are willing to take risk. In this case, borrowing conditions are easy and businesses have access to the capital they need, causing the economy to expand.

Conclusion
There are several tools that can help determine the depth of a credit crisis. By looking at U.S. Treasuries, LIBOR, the TED spread, commercial paper and high-yield bonds, you can get a glimpse into how nervous bank and investors are about assuming risk, which is an important determinant of what the economy will look like going forward. While no single indicator is more important than another, the correlation of all of these will confirm the overall conditions in the credit markets.

Gold and Oil Thoughts and what is Next

The past few weeks have been fast moving with fearful investors clearly in control. As we all know fear is the most powerful force in the financial market and when the hedge funds and the masses get spooked they all dart in one direction like a school of fish. Watching the charts and volume levels it’s clear that money was/is flowing out of stocks and into precious metals as the risk off safe play. This was explained in last week’s report on how the GLD etf can be used as a fear/sentiment indicator (read here).

To make a long story short, I feel as though Euro-Land is going through something similar to what we (the USA) went through in late 2008 and first quarter of 2009. Keeping my analysis simple and to the point it’s very likely that Euro-Land will resolve their financial issues and their stock markets will bottom in the next month or so… If their market bottoms, so will the US market, which will be perfect timing as the market is currently oversold, sentiment is now turning bearish and we have had a sizable pullback in line with normal bull market corrections.

My thinking looking forward 2-6 weeks is that stocks rally, financials rocket higher, bond prices fall, gold falls and oil rises as it will be a risk off trading environment again. Of course all this would happen after Euro-Land resolves some of their key financial issues. I’m being very optimistic here but we could be nearing a major low that could kick start another massive 1 year rally.

Stepping away from that longer term outlook let’s take a peek at the shorter term trends for oil, gold and stocks.

Crude Oil 60 Minute Chart (1 month view)
The recent price action for crude oil remains bearish/neutral in my opinion. We saw a drift higher into resistance with declining volume then a sharp pullback on heavy volume. This tells me oil remains in a down trend. It may be forming a base which would act as a launch pad in the coming weeks for higher prices but only time will tell and I will update as price unfolds.

Gold 4 Hour Chart (One Month View)
Gold has been performing very well for our entry point but the recent price action is starting to look toppy. Gold and many commodities regularly form this pattern of three wave pushes to new highs just before a sizable correction takes place. I am bullish on gold long term and for a few more weeks, but I do feel as though there will be a multi month correction in the price of gold (Read More) soon so be sure to tighten your protective stops as price moves higher.

SPY ETF Weekly Chart (Two Year View)
The stock market has been hit hard and a lot of damage has also been done to the charts on a technical stand point. The amount of damage and fear that has happening generally takes some time to stabilize and heal before another move takes place. Until Euro-Land resolves some of their major issues the US market will be held hostage and under pressure. So I anticipate several weeks of volatility and wild daily price swings similar to what we saw in July of 2010. This type of trading environment can work very well for options traders (Read More).

Weekly Trading Conclusion:
In short, the market price action is favoring very short term traders (day traders). We are seeing complete price swings which can normally be swing traded happen in just hours… Until we get another extreme setup or stabilization (less big headline news) in the market we will be more of a spectator than a trader to preserve capital.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Barron’s: Buy Emerging Markets

Where the Buys Are

Emerging markets are cheaper than their developed counterparts with far more growth. Earnings for the MSCI Emerging Markets index are expected to grow at 15% over the long term, versus 12% for MSCI World index.



Recent Change P/E** 2011**
Market Index Level YTD 1-Yr 3-Yr* 2011 2012 Price/Book
Brazil Bovespa 52,482.82 -23.30% -21.40% -0.10% 8.6 7.6 1.2
Comments: Latin America’s economic dynamo selling at relatively low valuation.
China Shanghai 2,534.36 -8.9 -4 5.1 11.7 9.7 1.8
Comments: Concerns of hard-landing for economy could be priced into stocks.
Russia RTS 1,535.72 -10.5 8.6 -2.4 5 4.7 0.9
Comments: Should benefit if oil stabilizes, and very cheap.
South Korea Kospi 1,744.88 -9.3 5.6 7.4 8.7 7.6 1.1
Comments: Some analysts expect 2011 GDP to grow a sturdy 5%.
Taiwan Taiex 7,342.96 -15.1 -3.9 6.7 12.9 10.7 1.5
Comments: Reasonably valued, big commodity exporter.
India Sensex 16,469.80 -19.7 -9.8 5.4 13.4 11.5 2.4
Comments: One of worst-performing markets this year but GDP still growing strong.
MSCI Emerging Markets 41,204.16 -14.5 -4.6 1.1 12.6 N/A 1.9
Comments: Impressive GDP growth, well-run economy merit premium valuation.
MSCI World 782.98 -12.8 -2.8 -6.5 14.4 N/A 1.8
*Annualzed. **Estimated. Sources: Bloomberg; MSCI

China, Brazil and South Korea, it bears noting, are among the biggest and most liquid markets in the developing world.

CNBC Business - July/August 2011


CNBC Business - July/August 2011
English | PDF | 132 Pages | 16.48 MB


CNBC Business (Formerly known as European Business) is the leading monthly business magazine written by Europeans for Europeans. It offers a unique, engaging view of the people and businesses driving the European economy. Each issue will feature exclusive interviews with big hitters, emerging entrepreneurs and players behind the scenes. CNBC Business will produce special annual reports on the Top European Executives and Top Companies within Europe. For Movers, Shakers and Dealmakers! Stay ahead of the competition with this monthly magazine with incisive articles on business in Europe and the personalities that drive the economy across the Atlantic.
read it here