I looked at the CIVETS nations [1] in the summer of 2010 and here is how they have performed since.
BRICs vs. CIVETS
(Market returns as measured by a leading country-specific ETF.)
At the time, I suggested investors steer clear of Egypt, and this
portfolio would have gained 16% if Egypt were excluded, outperforming
the BRICs by 23 percentage points or by nearly 10% on an annualized basis.(Market returns as measured by a leading country-specific ETF.)
Forget emerging markets?
Yet in that time frame, the S&P 500 has gained a robust 49%. In effect, you would have been wise to simply ignore foreign markets during the past few years and save yourself a lot of trouble. But that's not the way this period should be viewed. Short-term phases of relative performance do not highlight long-term dynamics at play, as well as the opportunities for investors.
Yet the past few years have taught investors that these acronyms are helpful only to a point. The BRICs are substantial economies and hold more than roughly half of the world's population. The CIVETs can be seen as regional hubs -- countries such as Turkey and South Africa conduct a great deal of trade with their neighbors. (more)
Please share this article
No comments:
Post a Comment