![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZD12gpdYKdG80Ioi1VTmBHXpAneMObCU9T0is3yMq3KAJAn0CTWBo-EeGhHaGWpcwoGzg4xhkfSWoxNek1bHTwtdw9u075q-aH-NV-DOsP434q-c1lDUv7zZfUe58D7FF6SlgB5wNwVop/s320/dow-36000.png)
In the ensuing decade since this book (and I use the term lightly) was published, the Dow is still below where it was 10 years ago, rather than tripling in price. The Nasdaq remains more than 60% below its highs of one decade ago.
I tried to read the book as a history lesson, but it was, to be blunt, unreadable. I got through enough to learn the basic argument they made: Stocks have been undervalued for decades, and over the ensuing years, we should expect a dramatic one-time upward adjustment in stock prices. Why? People were about to figure out what only these two geniuses already knew (hubris anyone?). (more)
No comments:
Post a Comment